[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: amanda vs 2.6
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:12:10PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings everybody, scsi folks in particular;
> I don't know if I've got a bad, miss-set link thats effecting the
> build of amanda, or ???
> Preconditions:
> tape drive has magazine, magazine ejected and reloaded, but all tapes
> still reside in the magazine carrier.
> Under a 2.4.22-pre10 boot, a run of amcheck will load the last loaded
> slot of the magazine and proceed to search the magazine for the next,
> correct tape.
> Under a 2.6.0test9 or 10 boot, it loads a tape, but then gets a signal
> 11 and exits. A re-run from that point, where it does have a loaded
> tape from the first run, proceeds 100% normally in searching the
> magazine.
> Preset the magazine again and run it with gdb, and get this only if
> booted to a 2.6 kernel:

Please retry with:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory

-- wli
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.038 / U:16.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site