Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:14:25 -0800 | Subject | Re: hash table sizes | From | (Jesse Barnes) |
| |
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:07:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > the size of these tables dependent upon the number of dentries/inodes/etc > which the system is likely to support. And that does depend upon the > amount of direct-addressible memory. > > > So hum. As a starting point, what happens if we do: > > - vfs_caches_init(num_physpages); > + vfs_caches_init(min(num_physpages, pages_in_ZONE_NORMAL)); > > ?
Something like that might be ok, but on our system, all memory is in ZONE_DMA...
Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |