[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: hash table sizes
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:07:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> the size of these tables dependent upon the number of dentries/inodes/etc
> which the system is likely to support. And that does depend upon the
> amount of direct-addressible memory.
> So hum. As a starting point, what happens if we do:
> - vfs_caches_init(num_physpages);
> + vfs_caches_init(min(num_physpages, pages_in_ZONE_NORMAL));
> ?

Something like that might be ok, but on our system, all memory is in

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.114 / U:27.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site