[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Make balance_dirty_pages zone aware (1/2)
>> Well ... not so sure of this as I once was ... so be gentle with me ;-)
>> But if the system has been running for a while, memory is full of pagecache,
>> etc. We try to allocate from the local node, fail, and fall back to the
>> other nodes, which are all full as well. Then we wake up kswapd, but all
>> pages in this node are dirty, so we block for ages on writeout, making
>> mem allocate really latent and slow (which was presumably what
>> balance_dirty_pages was there to solve in the first place).
> It is possible. You'd be pretty unlucky to dirty so much lowmem when there
> is such a huge amount of highmem floating about, but yes, if you tried hard
> enough...

I'm not really worried about lowmem vs highem - that was almost an
afterthought. I'm more worried about the NUMA bit - it's easy to fill
one node's memory completely with dirty pages by just a writer running
on that node.

> I have a feeling that some observed problem must have prompted this coding
> frenzy from Matthew. Surely some problem was observed, and this patch
> fixed it up??

No, just an observation whilst looking at balance_dirty_pages, that it's
not working as intended on NUMA. It's just easy to goad Matt into a frenzy,
I guess ;-) ;-)

"dd if=/dev/zero of=foo" would trigger it, I'd think. Watching the IO
rate, it should go wierd after ram is full (on a 3 or more node system,
so there's < 40% of RAM for each node). Yeah, I know you're going to give
me crap for not actually trying it ... and rightly so ... but it just
seemed so obvious ... ;-)

>> > If we make the dirty threshold a proportion of the initial amount of free
>> > memory in ZONE_NORMAL, as is done in 2.4 it will not be possible to fill
>> > any node with dirty pages.
>> True. But that seems a bit extreme for a system with 64GB of RAM, and only
>> 896Mb in ZONE_NORMAL ;-) Doesn't really seem like the right way to fix it.
> Increasing /proc/sys/vm/lower_zone_protection can be used to teach the VM
> to not use lowmem for pagecache. Does this solve the elusive problem too?

Don't think so - see comment above re NUMA.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.047 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site