lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] generalise scheduling classes
    Date
    In article <3FC0A0C2.90800@cyberone.com.au>,
    Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:

    | We still don't have an HT aware scheduler, which is unfortunate because
    | weird stuff like that looks like it will only become more common in future.

    The idea is hardly new, in the late 60's GE (still a mainframe vendor at
    that time) was looking at two execution units on a single memory path.
    They decided it would have problems with memory bandwidth, what else is
    new?


    --
    bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
    CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
    Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.021 / U:30.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site