lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] generalise scheduling classes
Date
In article <3FC0A0C2.90800@cyberone.com.au>,
Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:

| We still don't have an HT aware scheduler, which is unfortunate because
| weird stuff like that looks like it will only become more common in future.

The idea is hardly new, in the late 60's GE (still a mainframe vendor at
that time) was looking at two execution units on a single memory path.
They decided it would have problems with memory bandwidth, what else is
new?


--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans