Messages in this thread | | | From | (bill davidsen) | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test9-mm4 | Date | 24 Nov 2003 21:26:43 GMT |
| |
In article <20031121130810.GQ22764@holomorphy.com>, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
| diff -prauN mm4-2.6.0-test9-1/mm/memory.c mm4-2.6.0-test9-default-2/mm/memory.c | --- mm4-2.6.0-test9-1/mm/memory.c 2003-11-19 00:07:15.000000000 -0800 | +++ mm4-2.6.0-test9-default-2/mm/memory.c 2003-11-19 18:08:49.000000000 -0800 | @@ -1424,7 +1424,7 @@ do_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct | pte_t entry; | struct pte_chain *pte_chain; | int sequence = 0; | - int ret; | + int ret = VM_FAULT_MINOR; | | if (!vma->vm_ops || !vma->vm_ops->nopage) | return do_anonymous_page(mm, vma, page_table,
Good show, I would have expected the compiler to whine if there was a path out of a proc which returned an unset value. Or did it, and I didn't try w/o the patch to see it? -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |