lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cfq + io priorities
Hi!

> I suppose the nice() wrapper in glibc could
> be modified... but that's kind of silly when
> the kernel is getting modified anyway.

Perhaps modifying glibc is the right way after all. We do not want to
have nice(), ionice() and then cpunice() as a kernel interface.

OTOH it would be good to keep ionice() on the same scale as other
"nice" values so that "do-it-all" interface is easier.

Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.044 / U:1.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site