[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: scsi_report_lun_scan bug?
    On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:48:33PM -0800, Amit Patel wrote:
    > Hi,
    > I am using 2.6-test9-mm3. I noticed while doing
    > scsi_report_lun_scan(scsi_scan.c:891) the data
    > returned is assigned(scsi_scan.c:993) to signed char
    > array which causes the reported number of luns to be
    > huge while calculating num_luns to scan. Is there any
    > particular reason to be data is signed or just a bug?
    > I changed it to unsigned char and it seems to work
    > fine. I have attached a diff of scsi_scan.c. Let me
    > know if I am missing something.

    I don't see why making it signed or unsigned would make any difference.

    What values did you see before and after your patch?

    It should really be a u8, since it is a pointer to an array of bytes.

    (And all the scsi_cmd[]'s should be u8.)

    -- Patrick Mansfield
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.020 / U:39.892 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site