Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:50:10 -0600 | From | Zinx Verituse <> | Subject | Re: serio chaining in 2.6.x? |
| |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:37:29AM -0600, Zinx Verituse wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:47:48AM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 09:06:52PM -0600, Zinx Verituse wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > What do you folks think the best method for chaining the > > > serio drivers is? > > > > You grab the port. Then you create a new one and register it. And you > > forward all data that's not destined for you through to the new serio > > port. > > > > -- > > Vojtech Pavlik > > Many thanks -- I hadn't considered creating a new port, and I'm sure this > solution will work perfectly :) >
Unfortunately, I hit a snag... I can't see a way to rescan or disconnect all the ports that need intercepted (or, indeed, any of them that are already connected)
Suggestions welcome :)
-- Zinx Verituse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |