lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[Fwd: Re: Hard lock on 2.6-test9]


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Hard lock on 2.6-test9
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:33:32 +0000
From: Dan Creswell <dan@dcrdev.demon.co.uk>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
References:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0311151501000.1997-100000@bigblue.dev.mdolabs.com>



Davide Libenzi wrote:

>On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Dan Creswell wrote:
>
>
>
>>Chipset is E7505 with dual Xeons.
>>
>>Under X, I can provoke a lock just by waggling the mouse. I've had the
>>machine connected up to a serial console with nmi_watchdog=1 and, when
>>the machine dies, nothing is printed on the console (I guess that makes
>>it *very* bad :( ).
>>
>>
>
>Is NMI really enabled?
>
>$ cat /proc/interrupts
>
>
>
>- Davide
>
>
>
>
>
Sorry Davide,

I forgot to mention that a UP 2.6-test9 works fine whilst an SMP version
doesn't (unless I use "noapic")

2.4 in dual or UP seems rock-solid (bar one issue which may have been
network card related).

Dan.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.029 / U:41.084 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site