Messages in this thread | | | From | Rob Landley <> | Subject | Re: Patrick's Test9 suspend code. | Date | Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:30:45 -0600 |
| |
On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:08, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > This brings us to 2B) Snapshotting is way too opaque. It sits there for > > 15 seconds sometimes doing inscrutable things, with no progress indicator > > or anything, and then either suspends, panics, or fails and fires the > > desktop back up with no diagnostic message. > > > > On the whole, this is really really cool, and if you have any suggestions > > how I could help, I'm all ears. (I'm unlikely to poke into the code too > > Try "my" swsusp code. It should not fail silently; it may > panic the box but at that point you at least have a message.
I've had your swsusp hang, panic, go into a half-suspended state where I have to hold the power button ten seconds to actually power it off and reboot, and fail in a few other ways. What I've never actually had your code do is successfully suspend something I could resume from.
90% of the time, patrick's code does that for me. Yours has yet to do so even once for me.
I suppose I could give it another shot, though...
Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |