Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:35:33 -0800 (PST) | From | Davide Libenzi <> | Subject | Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air |
| |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Larry McVoy wrote:
> One of us is not getting it, maybe it's me. To build something like > you describe is pretty easy IF AND ONLY IF all you are asking for is an > update mechanism. As soon as you want revision history, diffs, rollbacks, > modifiable files, etc., you have to go to real BK. Is that OK? All you
Spec for bk-lite:
1) Binary with "no worky on other SCM" kinda license 2) update+history+diff (no rollbacks, no modifiable files, no etc...)
In that way all current users of bk2cvs, bk2svn, bk2xxx can simply do a pull from a bk repo and have they own scripts on their local machine to do their bk2xxx. It will be a lower headache for you and for kernel.org maintainers. Is it feasible ?
- Davide
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |