[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    SubjectRe: Some thoughts about stable kernel development
    On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:50:44AM +0000, John Bradford wrote:
    > On the other hand, many users out there are _obviously_ under the
    > illusion that 2.6.0-test has no known security issues, and that is
    > false. If their machine is internet-connected and compromised, it can
    > cause annoyance to third parties. Given that, I think a file in the
    > root of the kernel tree, saying something like, "Don't use me on an
    > internet connected machine unless you know what you're doing" would be
    > worth considering.

    Something vaguely like this might help the issue (with the obvious file
    created having the appropriate note in it)

    Untested, and I'm sure there are style problems, but the idea should be

    --- Makefile 2003-10-26 19:04:21.000000000 -0500
    +++ Makefile.ryan 2003-11-11 02:45:01.000000000 -0500
    @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@

    # That's our default target when none is given on the command line
    .PHONY: all
    +all: check-beta

    ifneq ($(KBUILD_OUTPUT),)
    # Invoke a second make in the output directory, passing relevant variables
    @@ -1027,3 +1027,12 @@
    endif # skip-makefile

    +.PHONY: check-beta
    + if [ -f README.Security && ! -f README.Security.IknowwhatImdoing ] ; then \
    + cat README.Security ; \
    + read ; \
    + fi


    Ryan Anderson
    sometimes Pug Majere
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.019 / U:2.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site