Messages in this thread | | | From | Herbert Xu <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cfq + io priorities | Date | Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:19:42 +1100 |
| |
Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net> wrote: > > Sure, but do it in a way that's friendly to > all the apps and admins that only know "nice". > > nice_cpu sets CPU niceness > nice_net sets net niceness > nice_disk sets disk niceness > ... > nice sets all niceness values at once
That's a user space problem. No matter what Jens does, you can always make nice(1) do what you said. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |