lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [ltc-interlock] 2.6.0 kernel: Bind interrupt question.
From
Date
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 14:33, Dong V Nguyen wrote:
> Have you seen any problems with interrupt binding on 2.6.0-drv45003 ?
> I tried this command to bind interrupt, but it does not work:
> ============================
> cat /proc/irq/165/smp_affinity
> ffffffff00000000
> echo 01 > /proc/irq/165/smp_affinity
> cat /proc/irq/165/smp_affinity
> ffffffff00000000
> ===========================
> There is nothing changed after binding.
> One thing I see is it shows 16 digits "ffffffff00000000" on 2.6.0 while
> only 8 digits in 2.4 .
> Do I need any special ways to bind interrupt ?

Is your architecure broken?

Works fine on x86:
root@foo:/proc/irq# cat 17/smp_affinity
ffffffff
root@foo:/proc/irq# echo 1 > 17/smp_affinity
root@foo:/proc/irq# cat 17/smp_affinity
00010000

--
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans