Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:18:00 +0200 | From | Christian Kujau <> | Subject | Re: crypto benchmark results with 2.6.0-test6 |
| |
Sorry, took me a while to retest.
Fruhwirth Clemens schrieb: > Hi, > > would you like to benchmark > > http://clemens.endorphin.org/patches/aes-i586-asm-2.6.0-test5.diff
yes, i did so, results on:
http://www.nerdbynature.de/bench/prinz/
> and > > http://clemens.endorphin.org/twofish-i586/ (experimential) > > too? :)
uh, i guess this masm/windoze/elf32 stuff is too much for me, i could try, but don't have time to dig into this. but you could try my script, and run benchmarks on your machine too. but: how is this twofish optimization supposed to go into mainline anyway? one had to use a special compiling environment to compile a kernel?
i set up these benchmarks for me too, because i needed to know what cipher is fast enough for my own use. usually i sticked to serpent, now aes-i586 looks quite good on this PC. i wonder if it will compile and so something on ppc32 too, but probably not. which is a pity, because my primary use of the cryptoloop is a ppc :-(
Thank you, Christian.
-- BOFH excuse #349:
Stray Alpha Particles from memory packaging caused Hard Memory Error on Server.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |