[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: must-fix list reconciliation
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:34:37 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <> wrote:

| On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:19:51PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
| > Hi everyone,
| > As you might or might not know, the must-fix / should-fix lists have been
| > inadvertently forked. We are merging them again, so please don't update
| > the wiki until we have worked out what to do with them. This should be a
| > day or two at most.
| >
| > I had the idea that maybe we could put them into the source tree, and
| > encourage people to keep them up to date by making them become criteria
| > for the feature and code freeze. Comments?
| I'm a little disappointed that after I spent time converting them into
| the wiki form, you're now proposing abandoning them again. This seems
| like a retrograde step.
| What I'd be more interested in doing is combining the must- and should-
| fix lists. As a first pass, just put all the must-fix items on the
| should-fix list at pri 4. One of the things I did was delete the things
| that appeared on both lists. This would obviously be easier if they
| were in one list ;-)

Agreed on that. I think the location is not the problem (whether
source tree or wiki), it's just an extra step to keep them updated,
and having no owner (or _many_ owners) often doesn't work.
Is one of you (or the two of you) willing to be the owner/editor?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.033 / U:2.376 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site