[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [AMD64 1/3] fix C99-style declarations

    > > This has happened more than once in the tree.
    > >
    > > When all the architectures have a minimum gcc requirement that accepts
    > > mixed code and declarations by default, it can be removed ...
    > Would be my prefered solution. Discourage 2.95.
    > Sooner or later we have to do that anyways when a bug in 2.95
    > is found that breaks code (has happened with all gccs so far).
    > Sooner would be better, as supporting 2.95 seems to be already
    > a significant mainteance burden.

    Well.. except that 2.95 is still two times faster than gcc 3.3 :-(.

    When do you have a heart between your knees?
    [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.019 / U:92.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site