[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [AMD64 1/3] fix C99-style declarations

> > This has happened more than once in the tree.
> >
> > When all the architectures have a minimum gcc requirement that accepts
> > mixed code and declarations by default, it can be removed ...
> Would be my prefered solution. Discourage 2.95.
> Sooner or later we have to do that anyways when a bug in 2.95
> is found that breaks code (has happened with all gccs so far).
> Sooner would be better, as supporting 2.95 seems to be already
> a significant mainteance burden.

Well.. except that 2.95 is still two times faster than gcc 3.3 :-(.

When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.038 / U:1.988 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site