[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [AMD64 1/3] fix C99-style declarations
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 10:27:50PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:

> x86-64 always used C99 and there is no x86-64 compiler
> around that doesn't support it. I must say I was somewhat pissed off
> that someone added that nasty warning to the toplevel Makefile
> just to comfort some gcc 2.95 users on i386 ("all world is a i386")

Sorry, that is bullshit. The change was entirely designed to prevent
people on such architectures hacking general files where there *do*
exist older compilers, to avoid breakage being introduced without it
being flagged.

This has happened more than once in the tree.

When all the architectures have a minimum gcc requirement that accepts
mixed code and declarations by default, it can be removed ...

Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.048 / U:4.860 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site