Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:54:29 +0100 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.0-test8: cpufreq longhaul probs..still :-( |
| |
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:16:21PM +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> With test8 there are still problems with the longhaul cpufreq stuff: > > longhaul: VIA C3 'Ezra' [C5C] CPU detected. Longhaul v1 supported. > longhaul: MinMult=3.0x MaxMult=6.0x > longhaul: FSB: 0MHz Lowestspeed=0MHz Highestspeed=0MHz
*boggle*, we had these fixed I thought..
I'm going to need you to litter the code with printk's to find out why your MSRs are returning zeros. Contact me off list if you want a patch to do this, otherwise.. don't be afraid to go overboard, the more debug info the better.
> I'll check if I can fix the min/max freq. Is Longhaul v1 correct for > this CPU? With cpufreq from 2.4 it always displays v2.
According to the documentation, yes.
Dave
-- Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |