[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] prevent "dd if=/dev/mem" crash
    Matt Chapman <> wrote:
    > It *does* signal a fault, in the form of a machine check. On other
    > architectures I'm familiar with this is usually implemented as an
    > interrupt, but the idea is similar - when the system bus controller
    > detects a bad address on the bus, it returns all 1s (for a read) and
    > signals an interrupt.

    I see. That seems OK. At least it means that software can implement a
    probing function and that the time interval between hot unplug and handling
    the unplug interrupt can be managed appropriately.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.018 / U:17.984 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site