Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:49:16 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Richard B. Johnson" <> | Subject | Re: killing a kernel thread. |
| |
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Ooh ooh RBJcode. I'm going to be fair and only pick one of the errors, > leaving many more for others to play the game too... > > > On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 09:51 -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > > __u32 volatile status; > > > while (!test_bit(0,&priv->status)) { > > test_bit() and friends work on 'unsigned long' not uint32_t. > > -- > dwmw2 >
Well it isn't RBJcode. It's Intel code. Look who wrote it before you give me any credit, especially your kind of "credit".
Also, Intel machines have 32-bit longs which are identical to 32-bit ints and this was an Intel driver........
Have fun growing up.
Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.22 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips). Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |