lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.6] constant_test_bit doesn't like my gcc
Date
On Thursday 16 October 2003 06:22, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > static __inline__ int constant_test_bit(int nr, const volatile
> > > unsigned long * addr) {
> > > - return ((1UL << (nr & 31)) & (((const volatile unsigned int *)
> > > addr)[nr >> 5])) != 0; + return ((1UL << (nr & 31)) & (addr[nr >> 5]))
> > > != 0;
> > > }
> >
> > Looks fine. Does your compiler get this right?
>
> Yep, thanks.

Sorry, but I still don't get, what a "const volatile" is supposed to mean.

I would be thankful for an explanation (s. Reply-To).

Regards

Ingo Oeser


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans