lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.6] constant_test_bit doesn't like my gcc
    Date
    On Thursday 16 October 2003 06:22, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
    > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > > static __inline__ int constant_test_bit(int nr, const volatile
    > > > unsigned long * addr) {
    > > > - return ((1UL << (nr & 31)) & (((const volatile unsigned int *)
    > > > addr)[nr >> 5])) != 0; + return ((1UL << (nr & 31)) & (addr[nr >> 5]))
    > > > != 0;
    > > > }
    > >
    > > Looks fine. Does your compiler get this right?
    >
    > Yep, thanks.

    Sorry, but I still don't get, what a "const volatile" is supposed to mean.

    I would be thankful for an explanation (s. Reply-To).

    Regards

    Ingo Oeser


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:55    [W:0.020 / U:122.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site