Messages in this thread | | | From | Ingo Oeser <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][2.6] constant_test_bit doesn't like my gcc | Date | Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:55:36 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 16 October 2003 06:22, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > static __inline__ int constant_test_bit(int nr, const volatile > > > unsigned long * addr) { > > > - return ((1UL << (nr & 31)) & (((const volatile unsigned int *) > > > addr)[nr >> 5])) != 0; + return ((1UL << (nr & 31)) & (addr[nr >> 5])) > > > != 0; > > > } > > > > Looks fine. Does your compiler get this right? > > Yep, thanks.
Sorry, but I still don't get, what a "const volatile" is supposed to mean.
I would be thankful for an explanation (s. Reply-To).
Regards
Ingo Oeser
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |