Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:12:51 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] add a config option for -Os compilation |
| |
Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote: > > the patch below adds a configuration option for -Os
Two problems:
a) It adds yet another reason why person A discovers problems which person B cannot reproduce.
b) It adds yet another reason why person A cannot work out the exact file-n-line where person B's kernel oopsed.
They are small concerns really, but it does make one wonder why we should not make this change unconditional: just switch the kernel to -Os?
Does anyone have any (non-micro-)benchmark results which say this is a bad idea?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |