Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: ld-Script needed OR (predicted) Architecture of Kernel 3.0 ;-) | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:32:48 -0400 |
| |
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:24:52 MDT, Eric W. Biederman said: > "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com> writes: > > > > Also, we have a module loader and unloader that allows modules > > to be inserted and removed from a running system. There are > > even experimental systems that allow the whole kernel to be > > changed without (apparent) re-booting. > > Any pointers. I have heard rumors but I have never seen an actual > implementation. Even one that failed in a lot of cases.
I thought it was a confused description of kexec being able to reboot without involving lilo/grub/etc.... [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |