lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: ld-Script needed OR (predicted) Architecture of Kernel 3.0 ;-)
From
Date
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:24:52 MDT, Eric W. Biederman said:
> "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com> writes:
> >
> > Also, we have a module loader and unloader that allows modules
> > to be inserted and removed from a running system. There are
> > even experimental systems that allow the whole kernel to be
> > changed without (apparent) re-booting.
>
> Any pointers. I have heard rumors but I have never seen an actual
> implementation. Even one that failed in a lot of cases.

I thought it was a confused description of kexec being able to reboot without
involving lilo/grub/etc....
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.056 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site