lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model
From
Date
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:45:14 PDT, asdfd esadd said:

> * a unified well architected core component model
> which is extensible

OK.. now for the terminally dense readers of the list like myself, could
you repeat that in terms that people who have more experience in
slinging C code than buzzwords will understand and rally behind?

Most of the time when I hear "component", somebody's trying to invent
yet another message-passing paradigm. And although there's certainly
a place where things like CORBA and the dbus stuff solve problems,
you have to remember that this is a Linux kernel, not Mach....

Alternatively, explain to me what this component model will do for us
that updating the docs on the kernel API won't?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.133 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site