lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.6.0-test7] cpufreq longhaul trouble
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> Ok, changing line 394 gives:
>
> <snip>
> longhaul: VIA C3 'Ezra' [C5C] CPU detected. Longhaul v1 supported.
> longhaul: MinMult=3.0x MaxMult=6.0x
> longhaul: FSB: 133MHz Lowestspeed=399MHz Highestspeed=798MHz
> <snip>
>
> But should it really be v1? With 2.4.20 I get:
> ep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: VIA CPU detected. Longhaul
> version 2 supported
> Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: CPU currently at 798MHz (133 x
> 6.0)
> Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: MinMult(x10)=30
> MaxMult(x10)=60
> Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: Lowestspeed=399000
> Highestspeed=798000
> Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: New FSB:133 Mult(x10):60
> Sep 28 21:09:28 paradox kernel: longhaul: New FSB:133 Mult(x10):30

Note that the various speeds etc now match.
Why we got away with this in 2.4 I'm not sure, depends which patch you used.

> x86info -a gives (running 2.6.0test7):
...
> /dev/cpu/0/msr: No such device

Heh. this was the important bit.. Doesn't matter now anyway.

Dave

--
Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.436 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site