[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: sys_vserver
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rik van Riel wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote:
> > I believe a reasonable portion of vserver can become a security module,
> > but there would clearly remain a need for some of the virtualization
> > (e.g. hostname, etc.).
> I definately want to have as much as possible of vserver
> using the normal security infrastructure, simply because
> it will save the vserver maintainers a lot of work ;)

I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of
it's own. It could be similar to LSM, e.g. allow pluggable
virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel.

- James
James Morris

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.033 / U:39.660 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site