[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: sys_vserver
    On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rik van Riel wrote:

    > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote:
    > > I believe a reasonable portion of vserver can become a security module,
    > > but there would clearly remain a need for some of the virtualization
    > > (e.g. hostname, etc.).
    > I definately want to have as much as possible of vserver
    > using the normal security infrastructure, simply because
    > it will save the vserver maintainers a lot of work ;)

    I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of
    it's own. It could be similar to LSM, e.g. allow pluggable
    virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel.

    - James
    James Morris

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.018 / U:55.456 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site