lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: sys_vserver
    On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Rik van Riel wrote:

    > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote:
    >
    > > I believe a reasonable portion of vserver can become a security module,
    > > but there would clearly remain a need for some of the virtualization
    > > (e.g. hostname, etc.).
    >
    > I definately want to have as much as possible of vserver
    > using the normal security infrastructure, simply because
    > it will save the vserver maintainers a lot of work ;)
    >

    I think virtualization is important/useful enough to warrant an API of
    it's own. It could be similar to LSM, e.g. allow pluggable
    virtualization modules, with no cost for the base kernel.



    - James
    --
    James Morris
    <jmorris@redhat.com>


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.021 / U:1.892 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site