Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:44:46 -0400 (EDT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: sys_vserver |
| |
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Wright wrote:
> I believe a reasonable portion of vserver can become a security module, > but there would clearly remain a need for some of the virtualization > (e.g. hostname, etc.).
I definately want to have as much as possible of vserver using the normal security infrastructure, simply because it will save the vserver maintainers a lot of work ;)
-- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |