[lkml]   [2003]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9?
In article <>,
John Levon <> wrote:
| On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:58:08AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
| > Linus' 2.6.0-test6 announcement doesn't seem to mention the
| > fact that 2.6.0-test5-bk9 fundamentally changed the semantics
| > of /proc/self and the /proc/<pid> name space. These used to
| Are these Albert Calahan's changes ?
| For some reason I can't fathom they were sent privately to Linus without
| them first being posted publicly anywhere ...

I thought there had been discussion a while ago, but I can't put my
finger on it. In any case, I think the OP was noting that it was a
fairly impactful (is that a word?) change not to get a line in the
changelog. That's directed to whoever actually prepares the CL, not the
author of the patch.

bill davidsen <>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:49    [W:0.131 / U:2.388 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site