[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently"
    On Thu, 09 Jan 2003, Richard Stallman wrote:

    > Calling the system "Linux" denies the GNU Project credit for the GNU
    > operating system. Most of the people who do that still give us credit
    > for the specific programs we developed. These words
    > GNU is not so important in new system. I take gcc and glibc as to be
    > outside the GNU project.
    > take a further step: they deny the GNU Project the credit even for GNU
    > programs (he said, earlier, this is on the grounds that companies have
    > contributed to them). That's like denying Linus Torvalds the credit
    > for writing the kernel, Linux, because companies have helped that too.

    Richard, some people are going to offer this "GNU/" attribution, some
    won't. I belong to the latter group although I recognize what the GNU
    project has achieved so far. It's a fairness issue, as has been pointed
    out. If we need to credit, then we need to credit every major
    contributor, and that's, as has been pointed out, a term that's pretty
    unusable to name that thing. You want Linux to subordinate under GNU?
    Fine. What sold GNU to the masses? Linux. They're friends. Still, you
    don't make friends change their names. Now finish that thread.

    > Has anyone been so completely warped by hatred of GNU? I don't know,
    > but it does not really matter. The role of GCC in the development and
    > popularity of GNU/Linux is a fact of history, and subsequent
    > developments cannot change it.

    There is not hatred of GNU. There is alienation by your horrible waste
    of time and energy. This is the wrong forum, this is only full of people
    who make ONE SINGLE component of what YOU want to be named GNU/Linux.
    You're about to get GNU credited but neglect all the other major
    contributors, XFree86 has been named, BSD is one.

    GNU code borrows interfaces from Solaris (and then does it wrong, for
    example the GNU libc name service switch is broken in that it does not
    retry NIS queries and then reports temporary errors through interfaces
    that cannot return temporary conditions such as getpwnam -- no way to
    place TRYAGAIN=forever into /etc/nsswitch.conf with GNU glibc, but
    required for reliable operation and possible to configure on Solaris). I
    ask you to rename all occurrences of Name Service Switch to Sun
    Microsystems Solaris Name Service Switch. Add [tm] and ® symbols as
    appropriate. Solaris gave you the ideas of NSS. So credit Sun.

    And now get this bloody discussion off-list.

    Matthias Andree
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.027 / U:15.752 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site