[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: tenth post about PCI code, need help
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>Followup to: <>
>>By author: "Richard B. Johnson" <>
>>In newsgroup:
>>>The problem is that he's discovered something that's not supposed
>>>to be in the code. Only 32-bit accesses are supposed to be made to
>>>the PCI controller ports. He has discovered that somebody has made
>>>some 8-bit accesses that will not become configuration 'transactions'
>>>because they are not 32 bits.
>>Right. That's what the code is checking for.
>> -hpa
> Somebody is very lucky the designer of the bus interface state-machine
> let him get away with it. This is a borderline "insane instruction" that
> could, on some (future?) machine, require a power-off to recover. This is
> NotGood(tm). It's like testing a fuse by shorting out a circuit. If it
> works, the circuit no longer works. If I doesn't, the circuit no longer
> works. Some things should not be tested.

If so, we will get an bug report rather than mysterious strange
behaviour. This is a good thing. (Amusingly enough, exactly this code
in the Linux kernel actually found a bug in one of the very early
versions of the Transmeta northbridge. It was fixed in firmware.)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.064 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site