[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Define hash_mem in lib/hash.c to apply hash_long to an arbitraty piece of memory.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 04:03:28PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> I did a little testing and found that on a list of 2 million
> basenames from a recent backup index (800,000 unique):
> hash_mem (as included here) is noticably faster than HASH_HALF_MD4 or
> hash_mem: 10 seconds
> DX_HASH_HALF_MD4: 14 seconds
> DX_HASH_TEA: 15.2 seconds

I'm curious how the hash at would fare. He has a
64-bit version at
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.062 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site