lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] linux-2.5.54_delay-cleanup_A0
From
Date
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Wouldn't it be saner to initialize the timer to something that can at
> least do estimated loops, and then just unconditionally do
>
> timer->delay(..);
>
> instead?

Basically a default timer_null structure? Sure that can be done (I think
others have suggested this as well, but I've just not had the time to
get around to it). I'll see if I can scratch that out quickly and
resend.

thanks for the feedback!
-john



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.056 / U:3.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site