lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: IDs
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 07:54:11PM +0100, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:

> > If we had a complete white/black list of devices with/without a unique id,
> > there would be no ambiguity.
>
> You mean for the devices on the white list.
> But most devices will not be on the white list.

I mean if it is not on the white list, treat it as black listed or ask
for user/admin input, so we safely handle the id.

> Our perceptions differ, I think. My impression is that chaos
> is the norm, and well-behaved devices are the exception.

For usb storage, cd's, and cheap storage yes, chaos.

> As you say - we can make a best effort and get a string that
> with some luck identifies the device uniquely. But no guarantees
> given.

Yep.

> Maybe that again means that the S/Z distinction can be dropped.

We still want to tell page 0x83 (starts with a number) from page 0x80
(currently starts with S) from default values (currently starts with Z).
Dropping the Z in favour of an empty string would be good.

-- Patrick Mansfield
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.028 / U:3.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site