[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [lvm-devel] dm fs?
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 04:37:28PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> What is the status of dmfs going into mainline?
> I saw that Greg KH posted a patch with some corrections to dmfs for
> 2.5.50?
> IMO it would be nice to have a kernel config option that makes the
> ioctl method optional when dmfs is set to y or m in kernel config.
> That will not only save a bit of code space, but it will also serve to
> encourage use of dmfs. :)

The last version I released is here:

There are still a couple of easy to fix issues with it (eg. the
kmalloc while a spin lock is held that Andrew Morton pointed out :).

Both Andrew Morton and Greg KH expressed concerns with the way I've
mapped the dm semantics onto the filesystem
So Greg is currently trying to get a sysfs interface working.

We need to get a concensus of opinion in the community as to what is a
good interface. I'm not going to be rushed into including something
in dm that could cause critism for years to come. dmfs is what
Alasdair Kergon and I have proposed, we're just waiting for an
alternative to kick off the discussions ATM.

- Joe
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.027 / U:9.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site