Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 6 Jan 2003 23:34:43 +0100 | From | Dominik Brodowski <> | Subject | [PATCH] cpufreq: make gcc-2.91.66 happy (Was: Re: [PATCH 2.5.54] cpufreq: update timer notifier) |
| |
This patch updates the cpufreq #defines so that gcc-2.91.66 should work happily with cpufreq.
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 01:34:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > > > +#else > > +#define adjust_jiffies(...) > > +#endif > > This will fail to compile on gcc-2.91.66. It's OK on 2.95.3. > > sparc64 requires a compiler of similar vintage (2.92.11), so > I am trying to keep 2.91.66-on-x86 limping along so that breakage > can be detected more easily. > > Please use > > #define adjust_jiffies(x...) do {} while (0) > > here. Or an empty inline, which tends to be nicer, because you > still get argument type checking.
diff -ruN linux-original/kernel/cpufreq.c linux/kernel/cpufreq.c --- linux-original/kernel/cpufreq.c 2003-01-06 23:27:59.000000000 +0100 +++ linux/kernel/cpufreq.c 2003-01-06 23:29:49.000000000 +0100 @@ -734,8 +734,8 @@ } #else -#define cpufreq_sysctl_init() -#define cpufreq_sysctl_exit() +#define cpufreq_sysctl_init() do {} while(0) +#define cpufreq_sysctl_exit() do {} while(0) #endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */ #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_24_API */ @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ loops_per_jiffy = cpufreq_scale(l_p_j_ref, l_p_j_ref_freq, ci->new); } #else -#define adjust_jiffies(...) +#define adjust_jiffies(x...) do {} while (0) #endif @@ -1131,6 +1131,6 @@ } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_restore); #else -#define cpufreq_restore() +#define cpufreq_restore() do {} while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_PM */ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |