[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Documentation/BK-usage/bksend problems?
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 08:42:59AM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> > The changes are fine, for 1.838 and 1.839, but the patch itself only
> > contains the effects of 1.839. The attached gzip_uu wrapped bk
> > "receive"able stuff is fine again and contains both ChangeSets.
> >
> > It seems as though it would take "diff 1.839 against 1.838" for bk gnupatch
> > and "changesets 1.838 to 1.839 inclusively" for bk send.
> I noticed the same when sending my Token Ring updates. Here i tried to
> send 4 changesets and only the second one ended up in the patch while the
> bk send part was OK. This was on Alpha, so i don't think it's arch
> dependent.

I have seen something similar.

bk export -tpatch -r1.984..1.985
only exports cset 1.985

bk export -tpatch -r1.984
exports cset 1.984 as expected.

bk export -tpatch -r1.983..1.985
will export cset 1.984+1.985.

BK Version:
BitKeeper version is bk-3.0 20021011025136 for x86-glibc22-linux
Built by: in /build/bk-3.0-lm/src
Built on: Thu Oct 10 20:33:13 PDT 2002

I will submit this with bk sendbug now.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.044 / U:1.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site