lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in non-free drivers?
    Date
    Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

    >WLAN yes - openap is superb stuff

    I didn't mention an open source access point. I already have a tried
    and true one in hardware from Lucent. I meant a "driver which doesn't
    lock up if it meets the WLAN card in an unusual configuration like
    say, on an PCI/PCMCIA bridge in a desktop computer (yes, Windows 2000
    screwed this one up, too. But they managed to fix it in SP1).

    Or really supports all of the 802.11b power management modes if the
    card is in managed mode (the WLAN card in my lap top sucks tremendous
    amounts of current even if I don't do any data transfers. Under
    windows the card goes to sleep and needs about 5% of the power). And
    yes, the access point knows how to manage the card. =:-) That was the
    whole point of buying an (start-1999) $1200 access point.

    >DHCP - yes

    Point taken. The ISC code seems to be the standards implementation.

    >ACPI - very recently become a truely open project so will I hope now
    >improve

    "very recently". :-)

    >APM - reliable for years, bios code (the nonfree bit) often very buggy

    The APM code on my Laptop still can't figure out how to display the
    battery level correctly all the time (it flips to "0%" for a few
    seconds every five to ten minutes), so I can't use the "shut down if
    below 5%" feature of apmd or my lap top would start shutting down
    every five to ten minutes. Needless to tell that the Windows 2000 APM
    has no such problem. BIOS? Really? (BTW: This is an Acer 710TE, one of
    the best documented Linux laptops on the net). The buttons for
    controlling the brilliance and contrast of the screen work fine in
    console mode but not in X11. But the Func+F<n> buttons don't work at
    all, because Linux considers "Func" the same as "ALT" (it is
    not). Only if I don't have a virtual console on the F<n> key, it
    works. It does work in console mode, though.

    Yes, I know, I can map all this to work correctly with X11 key
    mappings and I actually do know how to do it. But then again, I have
    21+ years of computing experience, starting with self-soldered 8085
    boards. My wife e.g. does not.

    The point is: With Linux I must (I can!) do all of this for myself.
    For my wife, Windows 2000 does all the grunt work. So she uses Win2k a
    nd I use Linux (but I have to support the Win2k for her. :-) After all
    she's not a CS major).

    >> If you find a well designed and completely specified and developed
    >> piece of open source software, you're almost sure to find a company or
    >> an individual having been paid for developing it and the putting it
    >> into open source.

    >I don't think its that clear. We have some extremely classy code done
    >for fun, or because people had the hardware, and some horrible code
    >people were paid to write.

    >Good code is about good engineers, and good engineers do things for many
    >different reasons and motivations.

    You're definitely right. I tried to polarize a little. :-)

    Regards
    Henning


    --
    Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
    INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH hps@intermeta.de

    Am Schwabachgrund 22 Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0 info@intermeta.de
    D-91054 Buckenhof Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:4.072 / U:0.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site