[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.5.54-mm3 wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 01:00:38AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >
> It seems to me that the patch you pointed here doesn't include the latency
> instrumentation.

No, it doesn't. You can monitor the latency using realfeel or realfeel2

But that won't tell you _why_ large latencies are occurring. For that,
you'll need to apply
and run `amlat'. This combination will spit out stack backtraces whenever
there is a 2 millisecond scheduling overrun.

> Where it is the needed instrumentation to meassure it?
> In the are no timepeg/intlat patches for
> 2.5...

That's not suitable for this work. intlat is OK for locating and
measuring interrupts-off code paths. But it's a bit hard to drive.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.092 / U:2.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site