lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface
Date
In message <1041583024.8648.11.camel@rth.ninka.net> you write:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:10, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Hmm, I thought the sched stuff all runs under the network brlock? If
> > so, it doesn't need to be held in, since it's not preemptible.
>
> The packet schedulers transmit, not receive.
> They have their own queue locking, along with the device
> xmit lock.

Then the patch to mark the "owner" should be straightforward. I
haven't looked at kronos's patch in detail, though.

Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.102 / U:3.864 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site