Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 31 Jan 2003 20:11:16 +0300 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest |
| |
Dave Jones wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 07:40:22PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > >> Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive, > > >> and thus a better FS benchmark. > > >> What do you think? > > >It's hardly a realistic real-world benchmark if you start nobbling > > >bits of it though. Not reading the preprocessed output is sure > > >to bump the benchmark points on an fs optimised for lots of small > > >writes. > > Sigh. The alternative is to strace the compile, write a perl scipt or > > something to get just the FS related calls out of it, and then create a > > program with just the FS related calls. gcc -E sounds easier to me.;-) > >It still seems like perverting a benchmark to turn it into dbench to me. > > Dave > > > Easier is not always correct.;-) We need better benchmarks in our field, sigh.... and correct ones are really a lot of work....
-- Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |