[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest
Dave Jones wrote:

>On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:56:07PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive,
> > and thus a better FS benchmark.
> >
> > What do you think?
>It's hardly a realistic real-world benchmark if you start nobbling
>bits of it though. Not reading the preprocessed output is sure
>to bump the benchmark points on an fs optimised for lots of small
> Dave
Sigh. The alternative is to strace the compile, write a perl scipt or
something to get just the FS related calls out of it, and then create a
program with just the FS related calls. gcc -E sounds easier to me.;-)


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.080 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site