lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest
Date
On Saturday 01 Feb 2003 12:56 am, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Try running with the -E option for gcc, it might be less CPU intensive,
> and thus a better FS benchmark.
>
> What do you think?

To be honest I have no idea. I'm not trying to find the filesystem with the
greatest throughput, but which utilises the least resources while maintaining
throughput. Perhaps we're looking for different things, but I'm open to any
suggestions; but they'll have to wait for my waking hours, and for others'
comments. These benchmarks are run manually for every stage as they are way
out of the scope of the design of contest and therefore time consuming.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.057 / U:31.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site