lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] ext3, reiser, jfs, xfs effect on contest
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Con Kolivas wrote:

>Using the osdl hardware (http://www.osdl.org) with contest
>(http://contest.kolivas.net) I've conducted a set of benchmarks with
>different filesystems. Note that contest does not claim to be a throughput
>benchmark.
>
>All of these use kernel 2.5.59
>
>First a set of contest benchmarks with the io load on a different hard disk
>containing each of the four filesystems:
>
>io_other:
>Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
>2559ext3 3 89 84.3 2 5.5 1.13
>2559reiser 3 87 86.2 2 5.7 1.10
>2559jfs 3 87 86.2 3 5.7 1.10
>2559xfs 3 87 86.2 2 4.5 1.10
>
>I found it interesting that there is virtually no difference in kernel
>compilation time with all fs. However jfs consistently wrote more during the
>io load than the other fs.
>
>
>This is a set of benchmarks with the kernel compilation and load all performed
>on each of the fs:

Compilation is inherently CPU bound, not disk I/O bound, so
compiling the kernel (or anything for that matter) isn't going to
show any difference really because the CPU Mhz and L1/L2 cache
are the bottleneck.


--
Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.078 / U:3.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site