[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] make lost-tick detection more informative
Andrew Morton <> writes:

> I've actually disabled it in -mmnext, because I get too
> much mail already.
> If you want to slap this on top of that and some new
> kernel-hacking debug config option, that would be neat.

On x86-64/2.4 it is a kernel option "report_lost_ticks"

The overhead is low (single if check in the timer handler), so this is fine.

If you suspect something goes wrong due to bad latency you can just tell
the user to turn it on.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.020 / U:1.696 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site