[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] (1/4) 2.5.59 fast reader/writer lock for gettimeofday
    Anton Blanchard <> wrote:
    > > These need to be mb(), not wmb(), if you want the bits in between
    > > to actually happen in between, as with your xtime example. At
    > > present there's nothing stoping xtime from being *read* before
    > > your read from pre_sequence happens.
    > But with frlocks we synchronise writers with a spinlock, so shouldnt it
    > provide that synchronisation?

    Richard is referring to the new fr_write_begin/end code, which doesn't take a
    spinlock because it assumes that writer serialisation has been provided by
    external means.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.024 / U:6.456 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site