[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [OSDL][BENCHMARK] DBT2 results question
Cliff White wrote:
> As Andrew Morton requested, we have rerun the OSDL Database Test 2 on cached
> and non-cached versions comparing 2.4.21-pre3 and 2.5.49 and this time
> we have vmstat data.
> Actually, we have a _ton of data, which is why i'm posting this.
> What data in particular are you kernel coders looking for?
> We could graph each statistic for each set of runs for a side by
> side comparison 2.4 versus 2.5.
> We can also post the raw data, but 40 runs is a bit much to post on a mailing
> list.
> What would you find most useful?

Didn't you have a standardised set of number for the dbt1 runs? They
were pretty good if I recall correctly.

It is very hard to find dbt1 results at I normally have to
grep the lse-tech archives to find anything at all.

Ah yes.

That seems a reasonable summary.

> We will get the runs Andrew requested on 2.5.58 when we can get past the
> I/O bug Dave Olien reported last week.

That isn't fixed yet, and there's no workaround, alas.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.030 / U:2.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site