Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:29 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [OSDL][BENCHMARK] DBT2 results question |
| |
Cliff White wrote: > > As Andrew Morton requested, we have rerun the OSDL Database Test 2 on cached > and non-cached versions comparing 2.4.21-pre3 and 2.5.49 and this time > we have vmstat data. > Actually, we have a _ton of data, which is why i'm posting this. > What data in particular are you kernel coders looking for? > > We could graph each statistic for each set of runs for a side by > side comparison 2.4 versus 2.5. > > We can also post the raw data, but 40 runs is a bit much to post on a mailing > list. > > What would you find most useful?
Didn't you have a standardised set of number for the dbt1 runs? They were pretty good if I recall correctly.
It is very hard to find dbt1 results at osdl.org. I normally have to grep the lse-tech archives to find anything at all.
Ah yes. http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt1prfrns/results/2proc/linux-2.4.18-1tier/index.html
That seems a reasonable summary.
> We will get the runs Andrew requested on 2.5.58 when we can get past the > I/O bug Dave Olien reported last week.
That isn't fixed yet, and there's no workaround, alas. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |