Messages in this thread | | | From | Raphael Schmid <> | Subject | AW: Bootscreen | Date | Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:18:32 +0100 |
| |
> > Sure some of the kernel's output could be cleaned up a > > little, but for the most part its not "geeky" - its useful and > > informative. > They are geeky, but useful - If you got a system that causes trouble. > Otherwise, if your system works right, they are just some more bits > flickering on your screen. I was the one who began with "geeky". Sorry for that, was probably a bit ... well, strong.
> Why oh why do we always need to compare ourselfes to Windows. "Windows > does this, windows does that" Whatever.. that is of no relevance. And if > it was QNX or RTOS we are cloning and the thing we cloned is a good > idea, what shalls...? It seems to me that everything that lacks the > status quo in kernel message visability is a windows clone? That what I wanted to say with "Can we get rid of the "stupid guy who's trying to clone Windows" dogma, please?". Yours are more appropriate words. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |