[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Patches have a license
    On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Dave Jones wrote:

    > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:58:40AM -0800, Balbir Singh wrote:
    > > I would request everyone to post their patches with
    > > a license, failing which it should be assumed that
    > > the license is GPL.
    > Surely the license of the diff matches the license of the
    > code it is patching ?


    Insert a random amount of comments or linefeeds and hand edit the patch to
    conform on a --dry-run and it does not mate.

    Remember "patch" is only a series of offsets and comparison.
    There is no checksum against the file to be patched.


    Andre Hedrick
    LAD Storage Consulting Group

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.027 / U:71.712 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site