Messages in this thread | | | From | Dieter Nützel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] data logging patches available for 2.4.21-preX | Date | Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:49:57 +0100 |
| |
Am Montag, 27. Januar 2003 19:33 schrieb Chris Mason: > On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 13:14, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Hello Chris, > > > > as always very nice work! > > I have it now running fine on top of 2.4.21-pre3-jam3 (2.4.21-pre3aa1). > > Some fiddling was necessary but went smooth after all. > > My /home partition is mounted with -o data=ordered and the performance is > > great. Sorry, no real benchmarks, yet. > > Thanks for trying them out. > > > But some question stay open: > > Where is 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff > > 01-akpm-sync_fs-fix-2.diff is in the 2.4.21 data logging directory you > linked to below.
It was and I have it but it isn't any longer... Both 01- are missing, now
> > and 01-iput-deadlock-fix.diff? > > This is in the namesys pending directory, but doesn't apply cleanly > yet.
OK, you moved it;-)
> I'm rediffing both the quota code and the data logging code on top > of 01-iput-deadlock-fix (or I might just steal Manuel's rediff, which is > still in my linuxworld backlog).
Manuel's version (33b) had some trouble with -pre3aa1 (-pre3-jam3), too.
> > Isn't it needed anylonger 'cause you merged them and SuSE's ftp isn't > > updated yet? All files are the "old" one's from 15. January. > > ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/2.4.21 > > > > What about patch-2.4.20.rfs.06.05-transaction-overflow-fix-0.diff? > > Should I put it on top, too? > > That is included in 05-data-logging-33.
Nice, no recompile needed then ;-)
I'll do some "normal" vs data=journal/ordered "time synctest -F -f -n 1 -t 100 dir_name" tests, now.
Maybe I integrate preemption...
-Dieter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |